<aside> ⚖️
How Projects Are Judged
All submissions scored 0-100 across five criteria. Focus on what you do best—you don't need perfection in every area.
🎯 Key: Working demo + cited sources + clear problem = strong foundation
</aside>
Projects will be evaluated based on:
| Criterion | Weight | What Judges Look For | Project Context | Quick Self-Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarity | 25% | Problem statement (card) is crisp, Success Test is observable, demo is clear and reproducible | Presentation & Iteration: Clear communication of solution Technical Execution: Documentation quality | ✅ Can I explain my problem in 10 seconds? |
| Proof | 25% | Demo passes from clean start, Evidence Log is linked, sources are cited | Technical Execution: Functionality and code quality Real-World Feasibility: Evidence of working solution beyond theory | ✅ Does my demo run without help? Do I cite claims? |
| Usability | 20% | 3-Line Pitch is clear, captions/alt text present, grade-8 readability | Gender-Inclusive Innovation: Accessible design reduces systemic barriers & Presentation & Iteration: Communication to diverse audiences | ✅ Can a non-technical friend understand my pitch? |
| Rigor | 20% | README & ethical considerations defined, decisions & next risks defined, at least one risk addressed, tradeoffs explained. | SDG Impact: Documented alignment with measurable goals + Ethical Tech Development: Bias, privacy, exclusion mitigation & Real-World Feasibility: Deployment thinking | ✅ Did I document WHY I made key choices? |
| Polish | 10% | Timeboxed scope, tidy repo/files, no broken links, clean file structure, ethical considerations documented | Technical Execution: Code quality and professionalism Ethical Tech Development: Ethics integrated throughout | ✅ Would I be proud to share this link publicly? |
Next steps:
Questions? Ask in #support channel on Discord 💜